![]() |
![]() |
Sign up for our newsletter: |
![]() |

Colleges are almost always planning. The Admission Office is planning for the next class, Development is planning for the next initiative or campaign, Faculty are planning the next class or research project and students are planning all manner of things. Then, every so often, like Halley’s Comet or Brigadoon, the Strategic Planning process appears.
Strategic planning isn’t new, but there is a sense of urgency today. Once thought immune to the cultural conversation reserved for public elementary and secondary systems, higher education is now under the same scrutiny. There is new pressure to demonstrate outcomes and prove why students and families should make an immense personal and financial investment for a degree. Strategic Planning offers the hope of a targeted effort to review and renew the institution, identify key strengths and threats, and address those issues with the goal of improving student outcomes. By outcomes, some mean a well-rounded education, and some mean getting and keeping a job.
Except, even the best college strategic planning efforts fall short of expected measureable outcomes because the human factor makes it impossible. Higher education values discussing issues over the pressure of solving problems. Its mission is to imagine possibilities, not deliver certainties. The whole system is not well positioned to be measured for deliverable outcomes. At worst, the strategic planning process is no more than a pageantry of consultation that leads to nothing more than the production of a mission statement or an unread report. At best, directions are chosen and hope for change is renewed, but will likely be unrequited.
What’s the answer? Quit the charade? Create State and Federal mandates for planning, testing, and outcomes? The focus on outcomes misses the point. Success comes from playing to the strengths of the institution, not expecting it to do something that it can’t. The process determines the result, not the other way around; just not the same process as is popular now. The whole machine needs to be re-designed. If the same measures and accountability that are sought in the outcome are embedded in the process, life would imitate art.
It all comes back to the way you start – if the assumptions and components of your plan are measureable, what they produce will be measureable. If you’re concerned about all of the outcome talk in higher education, get out ahead it. Determine your own measures and outcomes before someone does it for you. Put your dreamers to work on ideas, your do-ers to work on implementation, and your measur-ers to work on outcomes.
No Comments
Comments
Powered by Facebook Comments